LWN.net Logo

Google should strip out unreferenced symbols... but it probably doesn't matter

Google should strip out unreferenced symbols... but it probably doesn't matter

Posted Mar 22, 2011 4:40 UTC (Tue) by swetland (subscriber, #63414)
In reply to: Google should strip out unreferenced symbols... but it probably doesn't matter by wahern
Parent article: Has Bionic stepped over the GPL line?

I can't comment on theory about what's copyrightable or not (I'm not a lawyer), but I can offer this fact:

The primary motivator in subsetting the kernel headers is to end up with a minimal set of headers necessary to encompass the userspace<->kernel interface surface, and avoid clutter, confusion, or future brokenness by avoiding exposing userspace to anything more than is strictly necessary to make calls into the kernel.

From a support standpoint, anything in headers that doesn't need to be there (as far as structures, function declarations, etc) is something that might break when we refresh the headers from a newer kernel version.

Knowing the habits of application developers, if we didn't yank the #if __KERNEL__ sections, *somebody* would inevitably write code that #define __KERNEL__ 1 and included some linux header for some absurd reason and then they'd be cranky if it stopped working in the future.


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds