| |||||||||||||
Herrn Muller AgainHerrn Muller AgainPosted Mar 21, 2011 11:02 UTC (Mon) by brianomahoney (subscriber, #6206)In reply to: Herrn Muller Again by lkundrak Parent article: Has Bionic stepped over the GPL line?
We shouldn't need to filter comments Muller should have more common sense and politeness NOT to do this FM please STFU
(Log in to post comments)
Herrn Muller Again Posted Mar 21, 2011 11:07 UTC (Mon) by FlorianMueller (guest, #32048) [Link]
@brianomahoney, you should re-read your own comment above with a derogatory four-letter word etc. and then ask yourself whether your "common sense and politeness" live up to your own standards.
Herrn Muller Again Posted Mar 21, 2011 12:38 UTC (Mon) by brianomahoney (subscriber, #6206) [Link]
FlorianMueller,
At the expense of doing what you do, always trying to have the last word, that STFU is not normally considered a _bad_ word.
Your arguements as uniformly tendentious, often wrong, _but_ always boring and your need to have the last word is a real pain.
But I have hammered this one to death, hope you get the picture.
Herrn Muller Again Posted Mar 21, 2011 12:45 UTC (Mon) by FlorianMueller (guest, #32048) [Link]
Interesting. STFU is above board for someone who demands politeness. How about CRUD, which you also used (and capitalized)?
Finally, in many cases people ask me questions and I answer them. I don't know what would be preferable -- ignoring or answering. In other cases I see misquotes, misinterpretations or misconceptions that relate to what I say. So I set the record straight in many (not all) of those cases.
You still haven't presented a good reason for not using filtering.
Herrn Muller Again Posted Mar 22, 2011 5:44 UTC (Tue) by rahvin (subscriber, #16953) [Link] Finally, in many cases people ask me questions and I answer them.And in many cases you ignore the question or divert the answer away with supposition and innuendo. Here's the question you keep ignoring: Exactly what is your motivation in this? It's been asked several times in different ways and you've ignored the question each time. You've attempted to stir up this tempest in a teapot and have yet to explain why this is so important that you feel the need to delve into legal examinations that you clearly don't understand and you continue to make statements about implied legal liability but have yet to cite single legal precedent in any jurisdiction. The worst part is this is the second "legal problem" with android you've attempted to expose and had it blow up as a non issue but only after it spread widely. The only logical conclusion, baring your own admission, is that you are spreading FUD for a reason that you won't reveal. The only reasons I can think of aren't very flattering to you, I doubt I'm alone in that.
Herrn Muller Again Posted Mar 21, 2011 19:09 UTC (Mon) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501) [Link]
brianomahoney, RTFM :-)
Herrn Muller Againn Tzafrir Posted Mar 22, 2011 16:17 UTC (Tue) by brianomahoney (subscriber, #6206) [Link]
Tzafrir, I am sorry, I dont know of a manual which would contain str reasons for Florian spreading FUD. Do you?
Herrn Muller Againn Tzafrir Posted Mar 23, 2011 23:32 UTC (Wed) by baldridgeec (guest, #55283) [Link]
Perhaps there should be an entry in missing(7) :)
|
|||||||||||||