| |||||||||||||
Kuhn: Thoughts On GPL Compliance of Red Hat's Linux DistributionKuhn: Thoughts On GPL Compliance of Red Hat's Linux DistributionPosted Mar 13, 2011 0:28 UTC (Sun) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458)In reply to: Kuhn: Thoughts On GPL Compliance of Red Hat's Linux Distribution by iabervon Parent article: Kuhn: Thoughts On GPL Compliance of Red Hat's Linux Distribution
No, this is nonsense. For, e.g., Ubuntu people (who use bzr, not git) or others who just don't like VCS this isn't exactly "preferred". Also, if I happen to hack on my program by keeping XEmacs buffers open on each file, do I have to distribute the memory image of the editor?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||