Red Hat and the GPL
Posted Mar 10, 2011 11:24 UTC (Thu) by dwmw2
In reply to: Red Hat and the GPL
Parent article: Red Hat and the GPL
"Back when people sent patches directly to Linus and he just released tarballs, was he violating the GPL?"
It's important to remember that there is a clear distinction between upstream
, and a modified version or fork.
Tarballs are a perfectly sane way for upstream releases to happen.
But I think that every competent open source developer, when they're not trying to twist things to make a point, will agree: When releasing a modified code base which is based on some upstream project, it is definitely preferable to release that in the form of original + patches, rather than as a monolithic tarball of the whole damn mess.
to post comments)