| |||||||||||||
Beyond Firefox 4.0: Handling an accelerated development cycleBeyond Firefox 4.0: Handling an accelerated development cyclePosted Mar 10, 2011 8:36 UTC (Thu) by epa (subscriber, #39769)In reply to: Beyond Firefox 4.0: Handling an accelerated development cycle by viiru Parent article: Beyond Firefox 4.0: Handling an accelerated development cycle I don't understand why distros do not have a 'xulrunner-stable' which other apps depend on and which doesn't have to update whenever Firefox bumps its internal version of the XUL libraries. Since Mozilla (AFAIK) makes no commitment to provide a stable API for xulrunner, this seems a simple necessity. But then, of course, somebody would need to backport security fixes to the stable xulrunner, so it's not that simple.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||