| |||||||||||||
Enterprise distributions suck and free software rulesEnterprise distributions suck and free software rulesPosted Mar 8, 2011 13:20 UTC (Tue) by SEJeff (subscriber, #51588)In reply to: Enterprise distributions suck and free software rules by raven667 Parent article: Enterprise distributions and free software
RHEL 4.5 was a disaster of an upgrade:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327591
Redhat took all of the upstream nfs client "fixes" that google primarily wrote and backported them to RHEL4. It did not go so well. The best thing I got out of working on this bug was ninja-level nfs debugging experience. See comment 8 for the secret sauce.
(Log in to post comments)
Enterprise distributions suck and free software rules Posted Mar 8, 2011 18:21 UTC (Tue) by ricwheeler (subscriber, #4980) [Link]
NFS client patches that google wrote?
Are you confusing google (no interest in NFS) with NetApp which employs Trond, the upstream client maintainer?
|
|||||||||||||