Red Hat has painstakingly built over the years a brand that basically meant "we do not play customer-hostile games" (and yes locking the customer in a support website like Oracle or SAP like to do is a customer-hostile game).
This brand meant RHEL sold well even though Red Hat salespeople (that were used to proprietary offerings) messed things up more often than less. Because the engineering departments rooted for Red Hat. Here we see those clueless salespeople winning a round and eroding this brand.
If Red Hat lowers itself to the level of vendors such as Oracle, I fear it will find out over time that on the "who sucks less" playing field others are better organised to win contracts (yay for "educational" conferences the other side of the world).
Posted Mar 7, 2011 20:27 UTC (Mon) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
[Link]
one of the benifits of opensource software is supposed to be the lack of lock-in. If you don't like one vendor (for any reason, including support), you can just start paying someone else.
for RedHat to now take that attitude that you should not be able to buy support for RHEL from anyone other than RedHat does a great deal to undermine this benifit.