This
National Post column says that the SCO case is a good thing for Linux.
"Open-source advocates are outraged at the audacity of the
lawsuit. They should instead be thankful. Linux must inoculate itself
against the nasty legal toxins that are endemic in the corporate
environment. And if we were to perversely pick a poison, the SCO suit has a
lot going for it. SCO is strong enough to provoke a strengthening of
Linux's defences but not so strong that it poses any real danger."
Bruce Perens has sent in the notes from his
Open Source "State of the Union" speech at the LinuxWorld Conference,
where he discussed the SCO case.
"What would the Free Software developers ask for damages? The only
salable asset of SCO, the Unix copyrights. This is something that Red
Hat or others who sue SCO could ask for, as well. Now, we already own a
superior product to any SCO Unix that has ever been shown, so we don't
consider this an extremely valuable asset. But it would be a suitable
close to the SCO story for the Unix copyrights to be transferred to the
Free Software Foundation."
Here's a look at LinuxWorld from
the KDE booth, with pictures. "Users were continuously impressed
by KDE, for obvious reasons. But easily the most often-asked question was
"What the latest version is" (3.1.3), and the cool new features in the
upcoming KDE 3.2."
TechWeb
covers the LinuxWorld keynote by Red Hat CEO Matthew J. Szulik.
" Keynote attendees showered applause on Red Hat's Szulik as a defender of the cause at LinuxWorld where some developers prowled the show floor selling T-shirts with logos deriding SCO.Szulik took the high ground in his keynote referring only twice, indirectly, to the SCO suit. "At a time when our conversation was framed around technical improvements we have devolved to speak about litigation," Szulik said. "You should be able to look at source code without fear of being arrested," he added later, sparking wild applause."
NewsForge examines
a roundtable discussion that was held at LinuxWorld.
"A roundtable of analysts from Forrester, DH Browne, Gartner, and IDC pondered the state of Linux and open source before a large audience at LinuxWorld Conference & Expo Wednesday. The consensus: Lack of a few key components make Linux a weaker alternative than it might be."
What Linux trade show would be complete without a robot that runs Linux?
InformationWeek
takes a look at the Centibots.
" At LinuxWorld in San Francisco this week, scientists from SRI International's Artificial Intelligence Center demonstrated Linux-based robots that can search for objects and people in environments unsafe for rescue workers, such as the site of a chemical spill or an earthquake-damaged building. The research project is sponsored by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Linux was chosen for the robots, called Centibots, because they require a small, reliable operating system that has drivers for a variety of devices, can be automatically installed, and have a journaling file system, says Regis Vincent, a scientist with the nonprofit research institute."
Here's the Darth Elmo Def Con
Dispatch from Linux Journal. "Def Con, of course, is the
biggest and best annual hacker convention in the US. Def Cons take place in
Las Vegas, Nevada, and span a three-day weekend in early August or late
July. The convention is attended by thousands of information security
professionals, hackers of all shapes and UNIX affiliations, law enforcement
officers both federal and not, and journalists both clueful and
clueless. Def Con is part security convention, part family reunion, part
flea market and 100% party. This year's Def Con, the eleventh, didn't
disappoint in the fun or socializing departments, and it delivered pretty
well on interesting ideas and discourse, too."
The Register
examines the Nimbus project from HP.
"According to the docs, HP has started calling on its user base to begin beta-testing the Nimbus software. The app set is basically a souped up version of Insight Manager that lets administrators manage Unix, Linux and Windows servers from one place."
IBM has filed a countersuit against SCO, according to
this Reuters article.
"IBM, in its countersuit filed in federal court in Utah, alleged SCO had breached the general public license for Linux and infringed on IBM patents, according to the court documents. SCO is based in Lindon, Utah.
SCO shares, which have gained sharply from about $3 since it announced its suit, fell $1.27, or 10.6 percent, to $10.73 in morning Nasdaq trading. IBM gained 42 cents to $80.13."
(Thanks to Robert Steinfeldt).
News.com has some info on IBM's countersuit. "IBM said that four SCO software packages violate four of IBM's patents. The patents cover a data compression technique, a method of navigating among program menus using options arranged in a graphical tree, a method for verifying that an electronic message was received and a method for monitoring computing systems linked in a cluster." Most people will certainly welcome a counterstrike from IBM, but the deployment of software patents to shut somebody down is always a bit of a cause for concern.
ZDNet is running a column by lawyer Thomas Carey on SCO's case.
"Any plaintiff complaining that it is being injured by wrongful conduct has a duty to mitigate its damages. In order for SCO to assert claims against Linux users, it has to take reasonable steps to lessen the harm that it is suffering. This means giving Linux users the opportunity to remove the infringing code from Linux. SCO's refusal to identify the Linux code in question is hard to defend." This is a good article to show to worried bosses.
The Salt Lake Tribune is carrying a Wall
Street Journal article on the SCO affair. "SCO says it won't
identify all the infringing code in Linux because Linux developers would
quickly replace it. But isn't that exactly what someone alleging a legal
injury should, for starters, want -- to stop being injured? Damages for
past injuries can always come later. Or maybe SCO knows that if it laid
out its cards, people would just walk away from the table laughing at its
hand -- rather than pay a license fee." The Tribune also has an
article on insider trading of SCO shares.
Vnunet reports that SuSE
backs Red Hat against SCO. "In an official statement, SuSE said: "We
applaud [Red Hat's] efforts to restrict the rhetoric of the SCO Group, and
the fear, uncertainty and doubt which they are trying to instil.""
ZDNet
looks at the latest hardware offering from Lindows.com.
"The company, best known for its consumer-oriented version of the Linux operating system, on Thursday launched a $449 desktop computer with a flat-panel monitor. It's the second such announcement from Lindows in just a few weeks."
SuSE has put out a
press release, stating that it stands behind Red Hat in the SCO case.
"SCO has already been halted in Germany and we applaud Red Hat's actions to help end their activities in the US -- and beyond.
We applaud their efforts to restrict the rhetoric of the SCO group -- and the FUD they are trying to instill -- and will determine quickly what actions SuSE can take to support Red Hat in their efforts."
News.com
reports
that TimeSys has joined the CELF.
"TimeSys, a seller of Linux designed to be embedded into various computing devices, has joined the Consumer Electronics Linux Forum, and its competitor, MontaVista Software, plans to announce a similar move next week."
News.com
reports on
the sale of 260 Apple Xserve servers to the US Navy by
Terra Soft Solutions.
"Terra Soft Solutions said the machines will be used as part of a sonar imaging system that defense contractor Lockheed Martin is building for the Navy. Rather than using the Mac OS, the Apple servers will run Terra Soft's Yellow Dog Linux operating system."
SMH.com has published
an article that describes a linux-based video road inspection system
that is being used to map road defects in Australia.
"What Viner and his team have ended up with today is a system that uses Linux to run five video cameras from the same kind of van used as an ambulance. It is all done at a speed ranging from 80kmph to 100kmph. The cost of the annual survey has, in the process, fallen from $1.2 million to $850,000. And the system which was devised has so far generated about 1.3 terabytes of video footage with few problems."
TechWeb
looks into Oracle's conversion to Linux.
""We run our business on Linux," Rozwat said at the LinuxWorld conference in San Francisco on Wednesday. "If you look at any IT company, Oracle is by far the leader at running Linux."
Oracle chose the platform because of its strengths in security, scalability, and performance, he said. In the coming year, Oracle will move its base development platform to Linux, including putting the open-source operating system on the workstations of 8,000 developers."
KDE.News
covers
a Linux Usability Report that was performed by Relevantive AG.
"The study is based on a broad test conducted with 60 people who had previous Windows knowledge but had never used Windows XP. For comparison, 20 other people were asked to try Windows XP for the first time. Both are possible migration scenarios as support for Windows NT is being dropped. The study is independent, as it was conducted without a client order."
ZDNet is carrying a
Reuters article on increasing adoption of Linux in India. "About
10 percent of India's personal computers will be sold with Linux rather
than Microsoft operating systems by March, 2004, says Linux distributor Red
Hat, up from nothing in January. Besides the switch of desktop operating
systems to Linux, analysts say the bigger worry for Microsoft is the
growing use of Linux among India's pool of an estimated 400,000 software
developers, many of whom churn out code for giants such as General Motors
and American Express."
InfoWorld reports
on a study that claims that the GPL may be unenforceable under German (or
perhaps EU) law. The main issue seems to be with the warranty
disclaimers. "Regarding such legal principles as liability and
warranty, the GPL clauses have absolutely no legal validity. Under the
license, developers and distributors of open software are not liable for
any problems with their products. The GPL avoids any wording that could
imply liability. Such a license is simply unenforceable under German, or
even European Union law for that matter." As the article notes, the
study was performed for a closed-source lobbying group. (Thanks to Yusuf
Goolamabbas).
News.com
interviews
Red Hat CEO Matthew Szulik on the topic of the SCO suit.
"We would like very much to see the court system provide the facts as soon as possible. We just want to know the truth. Let the facts be put on the table so they can be dealt with honestly. That's the goal. We want to see this resolved as fast as possible."
eWeek has posted
an interview with Jon "Maddog" Hall.
"I talk a lot with governments, for the most part industry has gotten it. The next really big scene will be the bulk of the independent software vendors [ISVs], and what they'll have to do to meet that marketplace. At the same time, there's a large group of the mom-and-pop businesses I call the "great unwashed." We're trying to interact more with local user groups and give them the marketing ammunition to go out and talk to business, educators and government."
In this LinMagAu article John Knight interviews
George Staikos about the state of video and audio drivers for Linux.
"Linux users need to demand drivers or hardware documentation for the
hardware they buy, or do what they have a right to do - buy
elsewhere. Promote the competitors' products. I think we've seen this
repeatedly in the Linux world already. More Linux users demanding open
specifications or drivers will mean more drivers in the end. Eventually it
will become profitable." (Found at KDE.News)
ZDNet talks with Novell vice-chairman Chris Stone about Linux, NetWare, Ximian, and more.
"Mono is great. I like the idea very much of being able to run .Net applications on Linux and recompiling things written in C# to run on Linux. We will become a big advocate for Mono. I hope Microsoft views it as a good thing."
OpenSector talks with
Nhlanhla Mabaso, the Open Source Manager at the South African Council
for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). "A question was
recently asked on one of the mailing lists about the possibility of
Nigeria's elections being conducted on an OSS platform. This raises
important questions about the transparency of election processes. Will
citizens, in the future, be content with a major company, aligned to some
political parties, having their results counted on this company's software
without being able to freely audit the software used?"
Bob Pendleton
discusses SDL on O'Reilly.
"SDL, the cross-platform multimedia toolkit, is powerful enough
to have brought over 40 commercial games to Linux.
It's also portable enough to run
just about anywhere that has graphics and an operating system.
In the second of a series of articles, Bob Pendleton demonstrates how to
use hardware surfaces in your SDL programs."
The Linux Journal continues the long process of building the 'ultimate Linux box'.
"Well, I tried what passes for a downloadable x86_64 distribution. It shall
remain safely nameless, to avoid embarrassing the vendor. I couldn't get X
to run at all. A lot of stuff was broken. In short, it was
totally unsuited to be associated with the Ultimate Linux Box. So we're
going with SuSE, and pay the price for being on the leading, bleeding
edge."
IBM's E-Zine, the Rational Edge has
an introduction to all things open.
"The IT industry is going through major changes. New concepts in technology, such as Web services and grid computing, are opening the door to tremendous opportunities for taking e-business to the next level of profitability. The potential of these technologies to transform business is truly remarkable, and open standards and open source software will play increasingly critical roles in this new world".
Rob Enderle strikes again on TechWeb.
"The SCO lawsuits, at the very least, show that discovery is incredibly easy with an open source product. In order to sue for intellectual property violations, you often have to get your hands on the source code of the defendants' products. That requires convincing a court to force the defendant to turn over the source code in a process called "discovery"; that process can be difficult.
The pain associated with getting hold of proprietary source code is one of the things that limits intellectual property lawsuits for commercial software. But with open source software, the code is already available, out in the open." You have to admire the honesty of it: the risk with free software is that plagiarism is easier to discover.