| |||||||||||||
Choosing between portability and innovationChoosing between portability and innovationPosted Mar 3, 2011 22:59 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Choosing between portability and innovation by mezcalero Parent article: Choosing between portability and innovation
Still, I think the asynchronous API was the right approach, if just because (as the PA simple API shows) it is possible to implement a synchronous API in terms of it, but not vice versa.
Mandatorily blocking I/O is a curse, even if nonblocking I/O is always trickier to use. Kudos for making the right choice here.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||