| |||||||||||||
Debugging conference anti-harassment policiesDebugging conference anti-harassment policiesPosted Feb 1, 2011 11:56 UTC (Tue) by fb (subscriber, #53265)In reply to: Debugging conference anti-harassment policies by patrick_g Parent article: Debugging conference anti-harassment policies
> How are we supposed to evaluate the talk if the slides and/or videos are not available online?
To promote the talk (technical) contents, the author can replace controversial images in 5 minutes and post version 1.1 online. Assuming, again, the author does regret the images.
(Log in to post comments)
Debugging conference anti-harassment policies Posted Feb 1, 2011 13:42 UTC (Tue) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link]
Posting the slides as-used is useful so that we (here, in this forum and other forums discussing this) can see what the conference policy discussion is about.
It provides an example of what gets labelled as "unacceptable". Without examples, people who find Mark's presentation acceptable would continue to think that the label "unacceptable" is only for slides which are much more sexual than Mark's.
Debugging conference anti-harassment policies Posted Feb 1, 2011 17:26 UTC (Tue) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501) [Link]
If you care about that, read the lecture notes (there's a link to them in the article). Much less graphic. Much more informative. Much faster to download.
|
|||||||||||||