| |||||||||||||
A tale of two SCSI targetsA tale of two SCSI targetsPosted Jan 27, 2011 23:48 UTC (Thu) by martinfick (subscriber, #4455)In reply to: A tale of two SCSI targets by dougg Parent article: A tale of two SCSI targets
> So I question this statement: "The most common implementation of the SCSI target subsystem is an iSCSI server, ...". IMO USB (storage) keys are the most common (and worst) implementation of the SCSI target subsystem.
I suspect that he meant a SCSI target implemented in linux. I could be wrong, but I doubt those USB storage keys are running linux (yet), are they?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||