| |||||||||||||
LCA: Vint Cerf on re-engineering the InternetLCA: Vint Cerf on re-engineering the InternetPosted Jan 25, 2011 11:25 UTC (Tue) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)In reply to: LCA: Vint Cerf on re-engineering the Internet by ebiederm Parent article: LCA: Vint Cerf on re-engineering the Internet
Yes, the science of TCP buffers is *unrelated* to other buffers below it. Simply because TCP is in charge of everything: reliability, end to end flow control, and network congestion avoidance, while the rest below is in charge of none of it.
Confusing these two very different buffering roles (TCP versus below TCP) is a huge mistake.
On the other hand, I wonder why a leaflet was needed at all. TCP auto-tuning is supposed to have fixed this problem already?
(Log in to post comments)
LCA: Vint Cerf on re-engineering the Internet Posted Jan 25, 2011 11:32 UTC (Tue) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link]
> Yes, the science of TCP buffers is *unrelated* to other buffers below it.
I take some of that back. In theory, they are not related. In practice, you can have nasty interactions between the two. In any case, they are totally different beasts.
|
|||||||||||||