| |||||||||||||
Sobotka: Why GIMP is inadequateSobotka: Why GIMP is inadequatePosted Jan 13, 2011 22:31 UTC (Thu) by bug1 (subscriber, #7097)In reply to: Sobotka: Why GIMP is inadequate by daniel Parent article: Sobotka: Why GIMP is inadequate
"If you are saying that design complexity cannot possibly be caused by the language then I strongly disagree."
Design _should_ be separate from its implementation, they are separate stages.
But if you are designing as you go then its likely to all turn to shit a few times anyway, the efficiency loss of the language probably isnt significant compared to lost time due to re-writing whole sections of code.
(Log in to post comments)
Sobotka: Why GIMP is inadequate Posted Jan 18, 2011 17:54 UTC (Tue) by daniel (subscriber, #3181) [Link]
"Design _should_ be separate from its implementation, they are separate stages."
That is the waterfall method. I do not find it as effective or efficient as the iteration method.
|
|||||||||||||