Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol [LWN.net]

From:		Stefani Seibold <stefani-AT-seibold.net>
To:		David Miller <davem-AT-davemloft.net>
Subject:		Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol
Date:		Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:14:40 +0100
Message-ID:		<1294780480.17388.2.camel@wall-e>
Cc:		eric.dumazet-AT-gmail.com, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org, netdev-AT-vger.kernel.org, shemminger-AT-vyatta.com, jj-AT-chaosbits.net, daniel.baluta-AT-gmail.com, jochen-AT-jochen.org, hagen-AT-jauu.net, torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org, pavel-AT-ucw.cz
Archive-link:		Article, Thread

Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 12:52 -0800 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:50:20 +0100
> 
> > Right, but currently there is no need for an IPV6 implementation, non of
> > our base station provide it and non of our mobile network customers use
> > it.
> > 
> > If it will be required in the future it will be implemented.
> 
> We require that you implement the ipv6 side for the submission right
> now.
> 
> Long gone are the days when we add ipv4 only implementations of
> protocols.

If nobody need it and no user in the near future out there, why should i
implement this? That is dogmatic only!

(Log in to post comments)