| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Bad, bad, bad...Bad, bad, bad...Posted Dec 15, 2010 23:25 UTC (Wed) by daney (subscriber, #24551)In reply to: Bad, bad, bad... by proski Parent article: OpenBSD IPSEC backdoored?
He did state his justification for publishing it. So perhaps a better question is not whether you think it is 'Bad, bad, bad...', but what you think about his stated justification.
(Log in to post comments)
Bad, bad, bad... Posted Dec 16, 2010 4:17 UTC (Thu) by proski (subscriber, #104) [Link]
At least Theo should have asked for permission. He should have stated his intentions privately. His correspondent should have been given a chance to object and to give his arguments against the publication. I see no evidence that Theo has done it.
Bad, bad, bad... Posted Dec 16, 2010 8:46 UTC (Thu) by renox (subscriber, #23785) [Link]
Bah, even if the correspondent had refused, Theo would still have published the email: he explains why in his email and his reasons are valid IMHO.
Bad, bad, bad... Posted Dec 17, 2010 10:42 UTC (Fri) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link]
> Bah, even if the correspondent had refused, Theo would still have published the email
This would still have been more polite.
|
|
||||||||||||