LWN.net Logo

Fixing interactive response in 2.6

Fixing interactive response in 2.6

Posted Jul 31, 2003 17:08 UTC (Thu) by cpeterso (guest, #305)
In reply to: Fixing interactive response in 2.6 by Peter
Parent article: Fixing interactive response in 2.6

I have no idea why Con is calling his patch series "-O#int". I guess int stands for interactive, but what about the O? He used to maintain a "-ck#" patch series and that naming scheme seems a lot simpler to me.


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds