| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Screw SunScrew SunPosted Jul 31, 2003 1:44 UTC (Thu) by walterbyrd (guest, #11620)In reply to: Screw Sun by dwalters Parent article: Sun Sees Road To Prosperity Paved With Its Own Products (TechWeb) >>Even if you don't agree with their pricing proposal (which isn't all that different to United Linux or Lindows, after all<< What's so good about Lindows? What is the point of united linux? With SCO gone, I think there are two companies in united linux, and only SuSe matters. >>With 60 PC vendors, including Dell, lining up to bundle Mad Hatter on their hardware, by fair means or foul this will result in more installations of GNU/Linux ending up corporate desktops, and that's a Good Thing<< Is it? Who knows what sneaky McNealy is up to? McNasty just announced today that he pleased to have the only legal version of linux. >>Scott McNealy certainly has got his priorities wrong in the past, focusing too much on proprietary Unix, and the licensing deal with SCO<< But that was long ago, and we all trust him now, right? Don't be niave.
(Log in to post comments)
Screw Sun Posted Jul 31, 2003 3:06 UTC (Thu) by dwalters (guest, #4207) [Link] McNasty just announced today that he pleased to have the only legal version of linux. He did?! :-o I concede that's an outragous statement, and is completely out of order. It does seem typical of his blundering and lack of vision: By saying that he's effectively backing a loser, beceause IBM's lawyers are going to wipe the floor with SCO, and then IBM will probably buy the System V copyrights when SCO go bankrupt. But that was long ago, and we all trust him now, right? Don't be naive. I stand corrected.
|
|
||||||||||||