| |||||||||||||
An alternative to suspend blockersAn alternative to suspend blockersPosted Nov 28, 2010 0:06 UTC (Sun) by rjw@sisk.pl (subscriber, #39252)In reply to: An alternative to suspend blockers by rvfh Parent article: An alternative to suspend blockers
Kernel developers are generally opposed to adding a separate /dev interface specifically for this purpose, generally speaking because it will only be useful to Android at this point (no one else seems to be interested in it, because user space on the other systems would have to be modified to use this interface).
(Log in to post comments)
An alternative to suspend blockers Posted Nov 28, 2010 20:26 UTC (Sun) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
So? It'll still be _cleaner_ than a userspace IPC daemon which essentially does the same thing.
And not accepting a driver for being Android-specific - that's also strange. Anyway, when suspend blockers infrastructure is in place, all it takes to provide /dev/wakelocks is a small loadable module which can live out-of-tree.
|
|||||||||||||