| |||||||||||||
Ghosts of Unix past, part 4: High-maintenance designsGhosts of Unix past, part 4: High-maintenance designsPosted Nov 24, 2010 8:16 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Ghosts of Unix past, part 4: High-maintenance designs by foom Parent article: Ghosts of Unix past, part 4: High-maintenance designs
Yes, but if you were designing a new system from scratch, would you choose to do that the way Unix has? I know I wouldn't.
(And you mean 'while *optionally* preserving the ability to switch back': a lot of programs really don't want to keep that ability.)
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||