Novell acquired by Attachmate
The big news in the Linux world this week is Novell's
agreement to be acquired by Attachmate. While the financial terms of
that agreement seem—at first blush anyway—to be a fairly
reasonable deal for Novell shareholders, there is something of an odd
addition: a concurrent sale of "intellectual property assets
" to a newly
formed holding company. That CPTN Holdings LLC was organized by Microsoft
makes the acquisition more than a little worrisome to many in the Linux and
free software communities.
Novell has been trying to find the right buyout offer since at least March, when Elliott Associates made an unsolicited offer to buy the company for $5.75/share. Attachmate offered $6.10/share, but it also gets an influx of $450 million from the asset sale to CPTN, so it is, in effect, putting up less money than Elliott Associates would have. In any case, the Novell board, and presumably its stockholders, are likely pleased with the extra $0.35/share they will receive.
In the 8K
filing that Novell made about the acquisition, the assets that are
being sold to CPTN were specified as 882 patents. Which patents
those are is an open question. While the idea of more patents in the hands
of Microsoft and a "consortium of technology companies
" is somewhat
depressing, it's too early to say whether they are aimed squarely at
Linux. Novell has been in a lot of different businesses over the years, so
it's possible—though perhaps unlikely—that these patents cover
other areas.
While Attachmate is not a well-known company in the Linux and free software
world—or even outside of it—it has made all the right noises
about what it plans to do with Novell once the acquisition is completed.
The press release says that Attachmate "plans to operate Novell as
two business units: Novell and SUSE
", which may imply that
there isn't
a plan to break up the company and sell off the pieces—it certainly
makes logical sense to split those, basically unrelated, parts into
separate business units. Mono
project lead
Miguel de Icaza has said
that Mono development will continue as is. Attachmate also put out a brief
statement to try to reassure the openSUSE community: "Attachmate
Corporation anticipates no change to the relationship between the SUSE
business and the openSUSE project as a result of this transaction
".
The 8K mentions some interesting escape clauses for Novell, including the
ability to void the asset sale if a better offer for the company and
those patents come along. In addition, if the acquisition by Attachmate
does fall
through for some other reason, CPTN can continue with patent purchase but it must
license the patents back to Novell. That license will be a
"royalty-free, fully paid-up patent cross license
" of all
patents that both Novell and CPTN hold (including the 882 in question) on
terms that are "no less favorable
" than those offered to
others outside of CPTN. Essentially, Novell wants to ensure that it can
still use those patents if it doesn't get acquired by Attachmate.
Though the 8K is silent about what rights Attachmate will get to the patents, one plausible scenario is that Attachmate is already a member of CPTN. If that's the case, it may be exempt from any patent lawsuits using the 882 Novell patents. That could set up a situation where an attack on various other distributions—but not SUSE—is made. Given the cross-licensing language that is in the 8K, it's a bit hard to believe that Attachmate wouldn't have some kind of agreement in place. That, in turn, could imply that some of those patents are potentially applicable to Linux and free software.
It is tempting to speculate about what this means for our communities—we have done a bit of that here and many are going much further—but it is rather premature. The escape clause certainly raises the possibility that there are other Novell suitors out there, so this acquisition and asset sale may not even take place. If they do, we will find out which of Novell's patents are affected and be able to see what impact, if any, they might have on Linux and free software.
Taken at face value, Attachmate's statements about its plans seem to pose no threat to our communities or to the many members who are employed by Novell. CPTN, on the other hand, may be a potent threat if the patents are used offensively against Linux and free software. While it always makes sense to be prepared for the worst, one can always hope that this particular transaction (or set of transactions) will be fairly neutral. With luck, it may actually increase the income and profits for SUSE and lead to more investment in free software. We will just have to wait and see.
Posted Nov 25, 2010 0:05 UTC (Thu)
by garloff (subscriber, #319)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Nov 25, 2010 22:26 UTC (Thu)
by marduk (subscriber, #3831)
[Link]
Posted Nov 25, 2010 2:29 UTC (Thu)
by ccurtis (guest, #49713)
[Link] (1 responses)
Novell and Microsoft have fairly extensive licensing agreements from Novell's early NetWare and Windows for Workgroups days through the Mono agreements. I'm not sure who all the other members of CPTN Holdings are, but I'll guess that they are other interested parties from Novell's past as well. Maybe even The SCO Group - who knows?
But mergers like these can raise a lot of hairy "ownership" issues. A relatively simple solution to these problems is to transfer the contentious issues out to another organization, and then have that organization provide uniform agreements to all interested parties - which sounds a lot like what's happening. This shell company gets the patents, and everyone gets equal access - Microsoft, Novell (if the deal goes bad), and Accenture. As far as we know, this may even be required by Microsoft/Novell agreements made with the Mono transaction.
While I'm not saying not to be vigilant, it's also important not to overreact. Until they're in the hands of the public, all software patents are equal threats.
Posted Nov 25, 2010 15:58 UTC (Thu)
by Seegras (guest, #20463)
[Link]
Just like land mines.
Novell acquired by Attachmate
Maybe Novell happens to have many old ones that happen to cover things used in Linux?? I've certainly not seen any uproar on Novell filing patents that would cover stuff used in Linux since Novell had bought SUSE. I would think that enough people were watching this that I would be surprised if a large number would exist.
Also I have seen Novell/SUSE contribute to GPL3 projects, which you would avoid if you had collected patents that you'd want to assert.
Novell acquired by Attachmate
Novell acquired by Attachmate
Novell acquired by Attachmate
> all software patents are equal threats.