| |||||||||||||
A high-level view of the MeeGo security landscapeA high-level view of the MeeGo security landscapePosted Nov 18, 2010 16:54 UTC (Thu) by xav (guest, #18536)Parent article: A high-level view of the MeeGo security landscape
> Protecting the device entails protecting the SIM lock and ensuring that regulatory requirements (for things like radio frequency emissions) are strictly adhered to.
Why do I think that this means protecting the device against it's owner, instead of protecting the owner's data ?
(Log in to post comments)
A high-level view of the MeeGo security landscape Posted Nov 23, 2010 2:59 UTC (Tue) by rrware (guest, #71420) [Link]
I understand your concerns and why you might assume that. I would just point out that I did specifically talk about protecting user data and privacy. Yes, there some ways we do have to protect the device because of regulatory requirements and I did point those out specifically as well. It is a reality of delivering a device to market that includes software controlled radios and modern battery technology.
|
|||||||||||||