Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Ghosts of Unix past, part 3: Unfixable designsGhosts of Unix past, part 3: Unfixable designsPosted Nov 18, 2010 8:11 UTC (Thu) by Cato (subscriber, #7643)In reply to: Ghosts of Unix past, part 3: Unfixable designs by dlang Parent article: Ghosts of Unix past, part 3: Unfixable designs
You are right about many things such as QoS, IPv6, etc.
However, Mobile IP is much better implemented in IPv6 so you don't get inefficient 'triangular routing' - http://www.usipv6.com/ppt/MobileIPv6_tutorial_SanDiegok.pdf
The biggest benefit of course is not having to use NAT for IPv6 traffic.
(Log in to post comments)
Ghosts of Unix past, part 3: Unfixable designs Posted Nov 18, 2010 13:19 UTC (Thu) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458) [Link] Yep, that's why people are clamoring for NATv6 ;-) (Just as the idiotic firewalling going on has made everything run over HTTP.)
|
|||||||||||||