Your "actual facts" relate to the early 1990's. I presented facts that concern the current modus operandi of the SFLC and the Moglen Ravicher law firm. I never criticized him for what he did in the early 1990's because I'm simply unaware of what he did then. I have criticized him only in recent years. That's why I believe that the facts I presented are the more relevant ones at this stage, and I don't see how something he did 17 years ago could possibly disprove what's known about his current modus operandi.