> Also, what you call analyst commentary isn't anything serious.
Ah, right, so you proactively define anything I might happen to quote as not serious.
> Which analysts do you mean? GroklXX? They've always supported anything IBM has ever done with patents.
I've no idea what you've got against groklaw. I might not agree with some of their analyses, but I've always found them to be an invaluably useful site for doing the tedious drudge work of gathering, transcribing and publicising what went on inside various court rooms which it would otherwise be very difficult to get.
> Who else? Any independent, knowledgeable patent professional? I haven't seen any serious analysis supporting the OIN's propaganda.
Eben Moglen is the most recent one on record with such an analysis, but I think you've already got them blocked in your disagrees with me filter.