Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
This isn't either/or. Phase in such changes instead!This isn't either/or. Phase in such changes instead!Posted Nov 11, 2010 23:04 UTC (Thu) by dgm (subscriber, #49227)In reply to: This isn't either/or. Phase in such changes instead! by dwheeler Parent article: Glibc change exposing bugs
How much should the changes be delayed? A year? two?
By that time maybe the targeted machines will no longer exists. Remember those processors are not exactly new (Core2 and Atom).
(Log in to post comments)
This isn't either/or. Phase in such changes instead! Posted Nov 12, 2010 18:26 UTC (Fri) by chad.netzer (guest, #4257) [Link]
And they are certainly not old, either. This optimization will be relevant for 3-5 years, at least. And the answer to your question is 6 months. ;)
|
|||||||||||||