| |||||||||||||
Fedora rejects SQLninjaFedora rejects SQLninjaPosted Nov 11, 2010 9:14 UTC (Thu) by pcampe (guest, #28223)In reply to: Fedora rejects SQLninja by jspaleta Parent article: Fedora rejects SQLninja
>I expect there to be further discussion along these lines. When a tool can
>be used for both legal and illegal purposes, how do judge whether the >technology is too risky to include?
The point is the definition of "illegal", because circumventing the censorship in Iran or China is illegal, and China is a major country (note that the rule is about "major jurisdictions" and not democracies, quite a big difference in the context).
According to this rule, we could devise a "Fedora China", with tor and many other packages stripped off: which is disgusting, really.
(Log in to post comments)
Fedora rejects SQLninja Posted Nov 11, 2010 13:40 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
If you call it Fedora something, you need Fedora Board to approve it which wouldn't happen without strong reasons and sufficient justification.
Fedora rejects SQLninja Posted Nov 11, 2010 14:07 UTC (Thu) by pcampe (guest, #28223) [Link]
When I fear of a "Fedora China", I fear of something made by the Fedora Board, to comply with some "major jurisdiction".
Fedora rejects SQLninja Posted Nov 11, 2010 17:43 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
It is never "some major jurisdiction". It is clearly defined. Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat and Red Hat is a U.S organization.
|
|||||||||||||