On that previous comment, what other reason would one want the capabilities of SQLninja if not to practice the craft of stealthily injecting and cracking? This qualifies as a kiddie tool for the unskilled to wreak havoc.
Posted Nov 11, 2010 9:06 UTC (Thu) by pcampe (guest, #28223)
[Link]
I don't care about SQLninja, really. I care about the policy.
Fedora rejects SQLninja
Posted Nov 11, 2010 17:17 UTC (Thu) by Cato (subscriber, #7643)
[Link]
There's a valid use of this and other penetration testing tools where you own the web app installation, or have been contracted by the owner to test security.
However, I can understand why Fedora doesn't want to distribute such tools - many people would use them for illegal purposes, and such tools are more clearly aimed at site hacking/cracking than more generic tools such as Perl (very popular as an exploit tool thanks to libwww-perl, but mostly used for non-exploit purposes.)
Fedora rejects SQLninja
Posted Nov 12, 2010 2:38 UTC (Fri) by gerdesj (subscriber, #5446)
[Link]
Get a grip.
This is a penetration tool. Either you use it for "good" or "bad". In the end it is still a tool.
It is a piece of software, not something that can hurt you physically - it enables an admin to test their system from the outside for flaws. Yes - it also allows someone else to do the same.
Is that bad?
If I really wanted to test the physical properties of my body, I might start with a really long run, OK a really short run. Err, maybe I'll just wheeze a bit. But I reserve the right to test those limits in any way I choose.
I refuse to allow noddys like you to lose perspective - SQLninja is just a program which is designed to show design flaws in another program.
Use whatever pejorative language you like but its just a piece of auditing software in the end.