| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
RFCs - insufficiently free?RFCs - insufficiently free?Posted Jul 28, 2003 20:03 UTC (Mon) by Baylink (guest, #755)In reply to: RFCs - insufficiently free? by jmorris42 Parent article: RFCs - insufficiently free? This is the reply that nails the problem. I knew that if I looked, I'd find one, and thereby be spared the hassle of writing my own. :-) They are *standards documents*. Of course they have to be immutable. But no one says -- so far as *I* can see, that you can't lift parts out for other uses, nor that you couldn't issue some derivative document *with a different name or identifier* that said something slightly different. "More Catholic than the Pope" says it pretty well, IMPO. But hell, what do I know. [Repetitive smart-alec catch phrase goes here.]
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||