| |||||||||||||
Ignoring the "open core" bitIgnoring the "open core" bitPosted Nov 9, 2010 11:15 UTC (Tue) by pboddie (subscriber, #50784)In reply to: FSFLA: Linux kernel is "open core" by jebba Parent article: FSFLA: Linux kernel is "open core"
Agreed, the "open core" rhetoric is misplaced, but the actual point of the message remains. If anyone were to submit stuff for inclusion in Debian or Fedora with "licence unknown", they'd be told to go and fix it.
(Log in to post comments)
Ignoring the "open core" bit Posted Nov 9, 2010 16:01 UTC (Tue) by BenHutchings (subscriber, #37955) [Link]
Yes, that's exactly why Debian doesn't include those.
|
|||||||||||||