LWN.net Logo

Shuttleworth: Unity on Wayland

Shuttleworth: Unity on Wayland

Posted Nov 5, 2010 12:19 UTC (Fri) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106)
In reply to: Shuttleworth: Unity on Wayland by AlexHudson
Parent article: Shuttleworth: Unity on Wayland

Every time I hear another "let's throw out X!" campaign, I become suspicious. It's not as if X is flawless, far from it, but its detractors seem to harp on petty and irrelevant nonsense more than actual flaws--nonsense like "Remote X is hurting desktop effects."

A new system designed to do what X does (the good parts) in a way which is incompatible with X and builds on what we've learned from X in the last 20 years, especially about what not to do, would be welcome. If the new system is just replicating a small piece of what X does and ignoring the rest then it isn't a replacement for X.

Is it time for X12 or a Z? Probably. But, please, let's not step backwards while we're at it.


(Log in to post comments)

Shuttleworth: Unity on Wayland

Posted Nov 5, 2010 16:09 UTC (Fri) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]

It would be quite another thing if somebody was actually working on X12.

But nobody is.

People are, however, working on Wayland....

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds