Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Hard to see if it was sarcasm or not...Hard to see if it was sarcasm or not...Posted Oct 26, 2010 22:22 UTC (Tue) by khim (subscriber, #9252)In reply to: Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel by ewan Parent article: Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel
If you are being sarcastic then please use "<sarcasm>" tag in the future... And if it was not sarcasm then I want to remind you that RedHat did exactly that in version 7.x (and yes, package was called kgcc).
(Log in to post comments)
Hard to see if it was sarcasm or not... Posted Oct 27, 2010 17:03 UTC (Wed) by chad.netzer (guest, #4257) [Link]
Maybe for sarcasm, we should instead use the <blink> tag. :)
Hard to see if it was sarcasm or not... Posted Nov 6, 2010 3:12 UTC (Sat) by efexis (guest, #26355) [Link]
Surely if it's sarcasm it should just be a <wink> tag rather than a <blink> tag? ;-)
|
|||||||||||||