Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Clang builds a working 2.6.36 KernelClang builds a working 2.6.36 KernelPosted Oct 26, 2010 16:02 UTC (Tue) by ewan (subscriber, #5533)In reply to: Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel by mpr22 Parent article: Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel
Yup. Can't imagine anyone ever shipping a distribution that requires a special copy of GCC just for the kernel, I mean, what would you call it- 'kgcc' or something?
(Log in to post comments)
Hard to see if it was sarcasm or not... Posted Oct 26, 2010 22:22 UTC (Tue) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link] If you are being sarcastic then please use "<sarcasm>" tag in the future... And if it was not sarcasm then I want to remind you that RedHat did exactly that in version 7.x (and yes, package was called kgcc).
Hard to see if it was sarcasm or not... Posted Oct 27, 2010 17:03 UTC (Wed) by chad.netzer (guest, #4257) [Link]
Maybe for sarcasm, we should instead use the <blink> tag. :)
Hard to see if it was sarcasm or not... Posted Nov 6, 2010 3:12 UTC (Sat) by efexis (guest, #26355) [Link]
Surely if it's sarcasm it should just be a <wink> tag rather than a <blink> tag? ;-)
|
|||||||||||||