Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Clang builds a working 2.6.36 KernelClang builds a working 2.6.36 KernelPosted Oct 26, 2010 15:55 UTC (Tue) by jwakely (subscriber, #60262)In reply to: Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel by wash Parent article: Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel
the obvious other linker to try is gold, although of course that's part of GNU binutils too ... there is a reason why people call it GNU/Linux, y'know ;)
(Log in to post comments)
Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel Posted Oct 26, 2010 16:53 UTC (Tue) by MisterIO (guest, #36192) [Link]
Isn't gold still unable to link usable kernels? Or is it just something that debian folks have fun writing?:)
Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel Posted Oct 26, 2010 18:34 UTC (Tue) by rriggs (subscriber, #11598) [Link]
Looks to be fixed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GoldIncompatibilities
Clang builds a working 2.6.36 Kernel Posted Oct 26, 2010 17:05 UTC (Tue) by nteon (subscriber, #53899) [Link]
As of a couple of months ago, gold was unable to link a working kernel for me. Seems to still be the case: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault
|
|||||||||||||