Yes, no doubt that the Dejavu project and community is amazing and has achieved a lot and thankfully it continues!
But seen from a license proliferation perspective it's less than ideal to have a project and organisation-specific model. The Dejavu license is actually Vera agreement + MIT/X11-like from Arev + public domain (whatever that means)... And the embedding is not explicitly covered...
The OFL has made features of the Vera agreement more generic and reusable across projects and organisations.
The Ubuntu font and a fresh look at open font licensing
Posted Oct 14, 2010 17:48 UTC (Thu) by simosx (subscriber, #24338)
[Link]
I mentioned earlier what DejaVu has achieved as a project (instead of a critical analysis). As far as I know, DejaVu is one of the few projects that have been publicly developing fonts, and managed to get them added to a variety of distributions and software packages (see at the end of http://dejavu-fonts.org/wiki/Download ).
Indeed there is the issue with the license; DejaVu is stuck with the license that came with Bitstream Vera, and as far as I know there has been no response from Bitsteram/GNOME to relicense Vera to the OFL.