| |||||||||||||
Statistics for the 2.6.36 development cycleStatistics for the 2.6.36 development cyclePosted Oct 14, 2010 7:28 UTC (Thu) by Gollum (subscriber, #25237)In reply to: Statistics for the 2.6.36 development cycle by dlang Parent article: Statistics for the 2.6.36 development cycle
Yes, I was also thinking that grafting the historical git repo would be a good idea.
And perhaps presenting the graph as a stacked graph, with older kernels lower down. This would make it easy to say "40% of the code is older than 2.6.24", for example.
(Log in to post comments)
Statistics for the 2.6.36 development cycle Posted Oct 17, 2010 14:12 UTC (Sun) by Lennie (subscriber, #49641) [Link]
I would actually like to know what the oldest line/code in the kernel is. :-)
Statistics for the 2.6.36 development cycle Posted Oct 17, 2010 15:52 UTC (Sun) by Gollum (subscriber, #25237) [Link]
I'm not 100% sure if there are full records back to 0.00 days, but I'm sure somewhere out there there are tarballs of a lot of old releases which could be imported.
It would make a heck of an experiment, building a *complete* git repo.
Statistics for the 2.6.36 development cycle Posted Oct 17, 2010 16:30 UTC (Sun) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
people have already done the work, that is the 'historical' repo that I was mentioning
|
|||||||||||||