| |||||||||||||
Lessons from PostgreSQL's Git transitionLessons from PostgreSQL's Git transitionPosted Oct 12, 2010 20:34 UTC (Tue) by daglwn (subscriber, #65432)In reply to: Lessons from PostgreSQL's Git transition by fhuberts Parent article: Lessons from PostgreSQL's Git transition
You're describing something different. The PostgreSQL folks aren't using the merge capability of git at all. They're doing manual diff+patch. This makes sense in a CVS environment where merging back to truck was incredibly, outrageously, ludicrously painful. Not so for git.
(Log in to post comments)
Lessons from PostgreSQL's Git transition Posted Oct 13, 2010 12:12 UTC (Wed) by petereisentraut (subscriber, #59453) [Link]
The PostgreSQL folks may or may not be using the merge capability in their personal workflow. I certainly use it. We just require that what you apply to the master branch is rebased.
|
|||||||||||||