| |||||||||||
guilty plaintiff?guilty plaintiff?Posted Jul 23, 2003 17:09 UTC (Wed) by tjc (guest, #137)In reply to: guilty plaintiff? by djao Parent article: SCO's new offensive When I said "guilty" I was referring to the accusations against SCO by members of the Linux community, specifically within the context of this discussion, not the SCO v. IBM case. Sorry about the confusion, I should have been more explicit about this. It seems resonable (to me) to speculate that SCO's recent actions may result in additional trips to court, especially now that they are attempting to extort protection money from people without even saying what it's for.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||