Depends on your definition of cheap. Where the average yearly income is less than $2000 a year the build out costs of a tower network can be so astronomical that it's not possible to recoup the investment and at the same time offer affordable service at the rates the average citizen can afford. The major costs in this equation are the equipment and what makes that equipment expensive is the software IP behind it all and the astronomic amounts charged for the back-end equipment that runs the network. Costs that are almost entirely software as the physical hardware is quite cheap.
The kicker is that even when the patents expire, or in countries where they aren't valid the closed ecosystem prevents operators from offering service at locally affordable rates without paying the IP tax. The ultimate goal (at least from my perspective) of all these FOSS GSM projects is to break open the closed ecosystem and crack the security that enforces it so that software isn't an expense in the equation. This relegates the costs to construction, towers, power and general purpose equipment with FOSS on top. Without the "software" costs the systems can be erected cheaper, maybe even to the point where people making less than $2000 a year can afford service. At the least it's definitely going to lower the break point where more people can afford cellular service. Even if it takes 5 years or more to crack open, GSM is going to have a long lifespan in areas with low average incomes.
Most people in the west don't realize it, but cellular phones are the primary means of access to information in large areas of the world. Not just voice, but the primary internet access as well. These efforts to crack this closed ecosystem and the security that enforces it are vital to free access to information.
Harold's role in this is critical as the security is a key component to building a cellular service. Not only that but the benefits to those of us in the west as he could find security holes that right now only the government and criminals are aware of.
Posted Sep 27, 2010 8:50 UTC (Mon) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
I live in a country with $2500-$3000 nominal GDP per capita (Ukraine, if anyone is interested).
We have like 80% of coverage for the whole country, with many competing independent cell networks. I can literally travel everywhere and get a good phone signal (even in Chernobyl).
GSM security testing: where the action is
Posted Sep 29, 2010 8:31 UTC (Wed) by mfedyk (guest, #55303)
[Link]
I imagine it's different in many parts of africa and some parts of asia and south america.
GSM security testing: where the action is
Posted Oct 7, 2010 7:46 UTC (Thu) by gat3way (guest, #47864)
[Link]
Same here (Bulgaria, nominal GDP/capita ~ $6000). Our three operators have >95% coverage since at least 6-7 years ago. Also, the bills are not at all expensive for the average person (Bulgaria is EU's poorest member). They were in the end of the 90s but that was mostly due to the fact that we had just one operator then.
3G did develop practically in the last 3-4 years and it was incredibly expensive in the beginning, now you can get postpaid plans with unlimited traffic for about $15-$20/month. Lots of people switched off from ADSL to the mobile telcos in the rural areas as it costs almost the same (and the national ADSL provider is notorious for its poor support).
Yet as the nice new Android smartphones and the iphones are quite expensive here, GSM is here to stay for at least a couple of years.
GSM security testing: where the action is
Posted Sep 27, 2010 11:28 UTC (Mon) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link]
I visited Niger, one of the poorest countries in the world; its GDP has never been above $500 per capita. There are three different GSM operators and decent coverage. Every working person has a GSM phone.
They can easily transfer credit from one account to another, sometimes using phone credit as mere pocket money.