| |||||||||||||
BKL-free in 2.6.37 (maybe)BKL-free in 2.6.37 (maybe)Posted Sep 23, 2010 14:20 UTC (Thu) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)In reply to: BKL-free in 2.6.37 (maybe) by NAR Parent article: BKL-free in 2.6.37 (maybe)
> Do you mean tested 10 years ago and was possibly working 10 years ago?
No: I meant in small but non-zero use still today. Replace "Amiga FFS" by a more appropriate example if required.
> I remember an article here about a kernel module that wasn't even compiling for some 4 years and nobody noticed.
I wasn't considering such extreme cases. This seems rather off-topic since nobody cares whether such broken modules use the BKL or not.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||