I'm finding it really, really hard to care about whether Apple's ObjC changes end up in FSF's, or anybody's, GCC. Is anything useful written in ObjC that runs on something not Apple? If Apple wants to make it easy for developers to code in ObjC, they know what to do; if they don't care, why should we? This just seems entirely intramural.
Posted Sep 16, 2010 7:05 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Well, there's oolite and GNUstep. But not a lot else that I know of.
Apple's Selective Contributions to GCC
Posted Sep 16, 2010 7:05 UTC (Thu) by PhilippeRoussel (subscriber, #23227)
[Link]
Well, maybe GNUstep, which is a GNU project, could be considered as useful. And GNUstep runs on a lot of plaforms.
Who's using GNUstep?
Posted Sep 16, 2010 7:50 UTC (Thu) by ummmwhat (guest, #54087)
[Link]
Let's be honest here, who's really using GNUstep for day-to-day computer use?
Who's using GNUstep?
Posted Sep 16, 2010 8:03 UTC (Thu) by michaeljt (subscriber, #39183)
[Link]
> Let's be honest here, who's really using GNUstep for day-to-day computer use?
And perhaps even those people will find a way to continue working if Apple's code is not merged.
Who's using GNUstep?
Posted Sep 16, 2010 8:28 UTC (Thu) by PhilippeRoussel (subscriber, #23227)
[Link]
I am !
And you could ask on GNUstep mailing lists, you'll find more users there. I'm not sure we need Apple's additions to gcc but some GNUstep developers seem interested.
Apple's Selective Contributions to GCC
Posted Sep 16, 2010 15:04 UTC (Thu) by TRS-80 (subscriber, #1804)
[Link]
SOGo is a quite nice scheduling CalDAV server and webmail/webcalendar client which is written in Objective C that I'm using. It's built on a framework called SOPE, that claims to mix WebObjects with Zope concepts, which sounds like it should induce SAN loss but seems to work OK.