LWN.net Logo

Re: Combined storage tree

From:  Dave Chinner <david-AT-fromorbit.com>
To:  James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-AT-suse.de>
Subject:  Re: Combined storage tree
Date:  Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:20:54 +1000
Message-ID:  <20100911082054.GF705@dastard>
Cc:  linux-scsi <linux-scsi-AT-vger.kernel.org>, linux-ide <linux-ide-AT-vger.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel-AT-vger.kernel.org, dm-devel-AT-redhat.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>
Archive-link:  Article, Thread

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:27:27PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> One of the requests from LSF10 in August was the production of a
> combined storage tree.  This is now ready at
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/storage-tree
> 
> It's actually a nightly built merge tree consisting of
> 
> scsi-misc; scsi-rc-fixes
> libata#upstream-fixes, libata#upstream
> block#for-linus, block#for-next
> and the dm quilt (which is empty at the moment).
> 
> I haven't yet added vfs or any of the fs trees, but if necessary, I can.
> 
> Note, because it's built nightly, like linux-next, it's hard (but not
> impossible) to use it as a basis for git trees (it is much easier to use
> it as a basis for quilts).

Hmmm. I was kind of hoping for an upstream maintainer tree, kind of
like the netdev tree.  I really don't see a tree like this getting
wide use - if I enjoyed the pain of rebasing against throw-away
merge trees every day, then I'd already be using linux-next....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2010, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds