Standards are about trademark, not copyright
Posted Jul 18, 2003 14:24 UTC (Fri) by
giraffedata (subscriber, #1954)
In reply to:
RFCs - insufficiently free? by wa1hco
Parent article:
RFCs - insufficiently free?
A standard is not a law. It is a definition.
So the point of a standard isn't to prevent anyone from changing it, but just to provide a common name people can use to describe something. The SCSI standard doesn't say I'm not allowed to use 0xF2 as the read command on my scanner. It just says I can't call it a SCSI scanner if I do, which tells you not to buy it if you plan to hook it up to a SCSI host.
So using copyright this way for RFCs is wrong. It means the author is using his copy right as a stick to maintain hegemony over the subject. By making it harder for someone to write a competing standard (he'd have to write it from scratch using his own words), he makes it less likely that someone will do so.
Trademark law is the appropriate tool. You aren't allowed to refer to anything but the original RFC 821 as RFC 821.
(
Log in to post comments)