Security quotes of the week
[Posted September 1, 2010 by jake]
But of course, an RFID chip allows for far more than that minimal
record-keeping. Instead, it provides the potential for nearly constant
monitoring of a child's physical location. If readings are taken often
enough, you could create an extraordinarily detailed portrait of a child's
school day - one that's easy to imagine being misused, particularly as the
chips substitute for direct adult monitoring and judgment. If RFID records
show a child moving around a lot, could she be tagged as hyper-active? If
he doesn't move around a lot, could he get a reputation for laziness? How
long will this data and the conclusions rightly or wrongly drawn from it be
stored in these children's school records? Can parents opt-out of this
invasive tracking? How many other federal grants are underwriting programs
like these?
--
Rebecca
Jeschke of the EFF
We show that we can observe private activities in the home such as cooking,
showering, toileting, and sleeping by eavesdropping on the wireless
transmissions of sensors in a home, even when all of the transmissions
are encrypted. We call this the Fingerprint and Timing-based Snooping
(FATS) attack. This attack can already be carried out on millions of homes
today, and may become more important as ubiquitous computing environments
such as smart homes and assisted living facilities become more
prevalent. In this paper, we demonstrate and evaluate the FATS attack on
eight different homes containing wireless sensors.
--
Vijay
Srinivasan, John Stankovic, and Kamin Whitehouse (unfortunately, only
the abstract of
the paper is freely available at the site)
(
Log in to post comments)