Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
LinuxCon: A tale of two bootchartsLinuxCon: A tale of two bootchartsPosted Aug 26, 2010 21:58 UTC (Thu) by PhracturedBlue (subscriber, #4193)Parent article: LinuxCon: A tale of two bootcharts
I must be missing something. The Intel guys were loading Gnome, and got to 5 seconds, right?
I assume they didn't use compiz (and while I use the Ubuntu netbook edition on mine, I dunno that I really need it either), but even that seems to be only 4 seconds additional. So what did the Intel guys do to gnome to make gnome so much faster than the Ubuntu folks can manage?
I'd love my netbook to boot in 5 seconds, but after trying MeeGo, I'm not willing to move to it to achieve that goal.
I like the interface Ubuntu provides on my netbook, but I'd be willing to try a different environment if it brought a significant speedup.
(Log in to post comments)
LinuxCon: A tale of two bootcharts Posted Aug 27, 2010 0:35 UTC (Fri) by Jonno (subscriber, #49613) [Link] I must be missing something. The Intel guys were loading Gnome, and got to 5 seconds, right? No, they used a slimmed down XFCE on a feature stripped X...
LinuxCon: A tale of two bootcharts Posted Aug 28, 2010 17:36 UTC (Sat) by i3839 (guest, #31386) [Link]
Or in other words: Pigs don't fly. ;-)
|
|||||||||||||