I believe the "Home" (cheapest) editions of windows have a license which prohibits the use of them in any virtualized environment. They want you to buy the next tier up if you're doing something complex like running in a VM instead of bare hardware.
So what do the proponents of Oracle's acquisition of Sun think now?
Posted Aug 22, 2010 12:57 UTC (Sun) by FlorianMueller (guest, #32048)
[Link]
I believe the "Home" (cheapest) editions of windows have a license which prohibits the use of them in any virtualized environment. They want you to buy the next tier up if you're doing something complex like running in a VM instead of bare hardware.
Thanks. There are always new things one can learn here on LWN :-)
From a competition point of view, I wouldn't be concerned about that. It seems reasonable to me based on how you describe it.
Since z/OS is by definition the opposite of a "Home" operating system, this kind of distinction is a non-issue for the mainframe matter then. But it's good to know.