Ten Years of Slackware
[Posted July 16, 2003 by ris]
[This article was contributed by Ladislav Bodnar]
From: bf703@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Patrick J. Volkerding)
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Slackware Linux 1.00
Date: 17 Jul 1993 00:16:36 GMT
The Slackware Linux distribution (v. 1.00) is now available for
anonymous FTP. This is a complete installation system designed for
systems with a 3.5" boot floppy. It has been tested extensively with a
386/IDE system. The standard kernel included does not support SCSI, but
if there's a great demand, I might be persuaded to compile a few custom
kernels to put up for FTP.
Yes, you have been taken exactly 10 years back in history when
Slackware
Linux 1.0 was rather unceremoniously unveiled to those who had the
determination and skill to get it installed on their computers. Since
the actual development had started at some point in 1992, it is safe to
say that
Slackware Linux is the
oldest surviving Linux distribution on the market today. It was created
by Patrick Volkerding and originally based on one of the first ever
Linux distributions called SLS Linux by Soft Landing Systems.
The Linux veterans among the readers will remember that Slackware 1.0
came on 24 floppy disks, 13 of which were the essential A series, while
the remaining 11 floppies contained XFree86 and graphical applications.
What exciting features could one find in Slackware 1.0? The Linux
kernel was at version 0.99pl11 alpha. It came with math emulation and
normal hard drive support, TCP/IP, support for ext2fs, msdos and
several other file systems, and it even supported a PS/2 style mouse.
It was compiled with libc 4.4.1 and g++ 2.4.5. The graphical part of
the distribution was based on XFree86 1.3 and the OpenLook Virtual
Window Manager was the default desktop environment.
New releases followed in rapid succession and six new Slackware versions
were announced during the remaining 5 months of that year. A much
improved Slackware
Linux 2.0 was released in July 1994. It came with a choice between
a stable Linux kernel 1.0.9 and a development kernel 1.1.18, and
included XFree86 2.1.1. It was about this time that Patrick Volkerding
turned the Slackware distribution commercial in cooperation with Morse
Telecommunication, who were about to release the product on a bootable
CD, together with printed documentation.
The Linux Journal magazine interviewed
Patrick Volkerding in the second issue of the newly launched
publication in April 1994. "Why did you call it
Slackware?", was one of the questions. "My friend J.R.
'Bob' Dobbs suggested it.", replied Patrick. "Although
I've seen people say that it carries negative connotations, I've grown
to like the name. It's what I started calling it back when it was
really just a hacked version of SLS and I had no intention of putting
it up for public retrieval. When I finally did put it up for FTP, I
kept the name. I think I named it 'Slackware' because I didn't want
people to take it all that seriously at first." Interestingly, a
potential merge of Slackware with Debian was under consideration in
those days, claimed the 27-year old creator of Slackware Linux.
Slackware
Linux 3.0 (kernel 1.2.13) came out in August 1995 and this was
followed by a considerable slowdown in the frequency of new releases.
It took the distribution almost four years to reach version 4.0 (kernel
2.2.6) in May 1999 (see this review).
This trend was broken 5 months later when another new release was
announced, and to the surprise of many, it was called Slackware
Linux 7.0 (kernel 2.2.13)! Why the sudden escalation of the version
number? The Slackware web site explains:
"I think it's clear that some other distributions inflated their
version numbers for marketing purposes, and I've had to field (way too
many times) the question 'why isn't yours 6.x' or worse 'when will you
upgrade to Linux 6.0' which really drives home the effectiveness of
this simple trick. Sorry if I haven't been enough of a purist about
this. I promise I won't inflate the version number again (unless
everyone else does again ;)
In the following years, the Slackware release cycle settled to about one
per year, while the more adventurous users followed the distribution's
continuously evolving current
branch. But the infamous dotcom bust brought a period of uncertainty to
the future of Slackware development. This happened when Slackware's
primary distributor Walnut Creek merged with BSDi, which was later acquired
by another company called WindRiver. Things started to look bleak when
WindRiver announced
in April 2001 that it would no longer support the development of
Slackware. Patrick Volkerding: "I'm working on setting up a
company so we can handle the publishing ourselves. Unfortunately, I'm
broke. I can get funding to publish and ship the release to all the
subscribers (and anyone else who wants it), but have no money to pay my
fellow friends until we make some."
Luckily for all Slackware fans, things turned out rather nicely as
Patrick Volkerding teamed up with Bob Bruce, the founder of Walnut
Creek, to form a company handling product sales. And, according to this
interview, Slackware is actually a profitable business: Patrick
Volkerding: "There were certainly times I looked around at the
trade shows at new distributions with larger booths and more employees
and wondered if I'd made the right move, but in retrospect I'm glad I
kept things small. Most of those companies aren't around anymore. When
the investments dried up they couldn't afford to continue operating at
a loss. Most of the funding for the Slackware project comes from people
who have subscribed to the CD releases, or bought CDs from our Web
site. This is what pays the bills and enables us to give away free
software to everybody else."
Things have always been kept simple and quiet at Slackware and this is
perhaps the main reason why the distribution's 90% market share, which
it enjoyed before 1996, has dwindled substantially, as new
distributions with a lot more ambition have come to dominate the server
rooms. Despite that, Slackware remains one of the top five Linux
distributions in terms of popularity and server deployments. Its
mailing lists, which have now been transferred into an online user forum at userlocal.com, have become a large
collection of some 170,000 posts over the years, while the sheer number
of active Slackware community sites in dozens of languages, perhaps
only rivaled by the number of sites devoted to Debian, is a clear
indication that Slackware remains a powerful force in the world of
Linux distributions.
Happy birthday, Slackware! Thank you for all the great work during the
past decade and we look forward to more "slacking" for many more years
to come!
(
Log in to post comments)