| |||||||||||||
Yea, the Clutter+GL requirement isn't set in stoneYea, the Clutter+GL requirement isn't set in stonePosted Aug 12, 2010 3:09 UTC (Thu) by jmorris42 (subscriber, #2203)Parent article: GUADEC: Owen Taylor on GNOME Shell
Yea, I'm glad to finally see a serious attempt to address what the plan is for non GL environments, such as every virtualization scheme in current use where the host system is Linux.
(Log in to post comments)
Yea, the Clutter+GL requirement isn't set in stone Posted Aug 12, 2010 3:19 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
This plan to fall back to GNOME Panel isn't new. It has been there right from the start.
Yea, the Clutter+GL requirement isn't set in stone Posted Aug 12, 2010 7:49 UTC (Thu) by michaeljt (subscriber, #39183) [Link]
> Yea, I'm glad to finally see a serious attempt to address what the plan is for non GL environments, such as every virtualization scheme in current use where the host system is Linux.
Where did you see that? Not that I think that this ought to be (as opposed to is) a problem, as the demos I have seen of Gnome shell (never tried it due to lack of a supported system) don't show any 3D effects that software rendering shoundn't be able to cope with. Perhaps llvmpipe will do it one day.
Yea, the Clutter+GL requirement isn't set in stone Posted Sep 5, 2010 10:54 UTC (Sun) by laptop006 (subscriber, #60779) [Link]
Er, VMware Workstation does 3D with Linux as the host
|
|||||||||||||