| |||||||||||||
Yama: not so fastYama: not so fastPosted Aug 9, 2010 21:09 UTC (Mon) by ilmari (subscriber, #14175)In reply to: Yama: not so fast by nix Parent article: Yama: not so fast
Have you tried submitting your patches to the eglibc folks instead of directly to glibc?
(Log in to post comments)
Yama: not so fast Posted Aug 10, 2010 5:58 UTC (Tue) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
eglibc has a stated goal to be binary and source compatible with glibc. So not too much room for many changes.
Yama: not so fast Posted Aug 11, 2010 23:46 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
Yeah, but -fstack-protector doesn't break either of these. I think it would work. I just need to switch jobs to one that isn't totally in bed with Microsoft (they're *proud* of it) and is willing to sign the disclaimer first :/ (they said they'd sign, and said they'd sign... and didn't sign).
|
|||||||||||||