| |||||||||||||
Yama: not so fastYama: not so fastPosted Aug 5, 2010 18:05 UTC (Thu) by SEJeff (subscriber, #51588)In reply to: Yama: not so fast by spender Parent article: Yama: not so fast
Please do, it would be interesting to read.
(Log in to post comments)
Yama: not so fast Posted Aug 6, 2010 17:07 UTC (Fri) by spender (subscriber, #23067) [Link]
Ok, I found the two mails in question from Jan 2005. As much as I would like to see this information public, there's simply too much personal/identifying information (much more than I remembered before making my previous post) about the sender to allow me to paste verbatim or even paraphrase specific events.
I don't think my record shows me to be a person to make something up (see: vendor-sec), but if anyone feels that way, feel free to ignore what I mentioned.
At least it wasn't a total waste of time to find the mails; there's a name in them that I now recognize that I didn't back in 2005 that gives me some interesting context.
-Brad
Yama: not so fast Posted Aug 8, 2010 20:55 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] I don't think my record shows me to be a person to make something up (see: vendor-sec)I don't think you make things up either, but, uh, vendor-sec is closed so it's hard for most of us to 'see' it :)
|
|||||||||||||