| |||||||||||||
Yama: not so fastYama: not so fastPosted Aug 5, 2010 12:59 UTC (Thu) by NAR (subscriber, #1313)In reply to: Yama: not so fast by thedevil Parent article: Yama: not so fast This is not exactly what happened, if you read the original e-mails: "push it into a special LSM or rather a non-standard rule for it". I don't pretend I have a clue about the technical issues, but I don't see in this mail that it was explicitly told that "if you put it into an LSM, we'll merge it". On the other hand the line "If you think the objection is about having things in fs/ you're smoking some really bad stuff." is really something that could leave bad taste in developers' mouth. Probably this is why it's meaning was missed/ignored.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||